User Profile
Select your user profile

Article

STRONG-HF and NT-proBNP:

stronger together against acute heart failure

This content is intended for healthcare professionals in UK and Ireland only.

strong-hf
Discover the promise of STRONG-HF through a patient’s voice

Post-acute HF vulnerable phase 1,2

The period starting with acute HF hospitalisation and the couple of months following, often called the vulnerable period, is a time of increased risk of morbidity and mortality for patients with HF.1

In the 30 days after hospital discharge:3

patient bed

18% of patients are readmitted

gravestone

5% of patients die

Optimisation of treatment is essential following acute heart failure, but many patients never receive full treatment optimisation: In the UK approximately 1 in 3 patients are on >50% of the guideline-recommended dose for ACE-i/ARB or BBs 12 months after their diagnosis4

Seize your window of opportunity with STRONG-HF1,2

The STRONG-HF, NT-proBNP led therapeutic strategy offers clinicians guidance on rapid initiation and optimisation of Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) during the vulnerable period before and after discharge, thereby supporting you in providing optimal treatment when it is needed most.1

What is STRONG-HF?

The STRONG-HF study was a multinational, open-label, randomised clinical trial, designed to assess the safety and efficacy of rapid up-titration of treatments, through the use of biomarkers including NT-proBNP, after acute heart failure, as compared to usual care.1

After enrolling more than 1000 patients, the data and safety monitoring board of the study recommended early termination of the study because the efficacy of the biomarker-guided treatment strategy meant it was no longer ethical to randomly assign and treat patients in the usual care group.

The STRONG-HF study design

strong-hf study design

*ACEi/ARB, ARNi, beta blocker and MRA

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria:

  • Hospital admission within the 72 hours prior to screening for acute heart failure with dyspnoea at rest and pulmonary congestion on chest X-ray, and other signs and/or symptoms of heart failure such as oedema and/or positive rales on auscultation
  • All measures within 24 hours prior to randomisation of systolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg and of heart rate ≥60 bpm
  • All measures within 24 hours prior to randomisation of serum potassium ≤5.0 mEq/L(mmol/L)
  • Biomarker criteria for persistent congestion:
    • At screening, NT-proBNP > 2,500 pg/mL
    • At the time of randomisation (within 2 days prior to discharge), NT-proBNP > 1,500 pg/mL(to ensure the persistence of congestion) that has decreased by more than 10% compared to screening (to ensure the acuity of the index episode)
  • At 1 week prior to admission ,at screening and at Visit 2(just prior to randomisation) either
    • ≤ 1⁄2 the optimal dose of ACEi/ARB/ARNi prescribed, no beta blocker prescribed and ≤1⁄2 the optimal dose of MRA prescribed or
    • No ACEi/ARB/ARNi prescribed, ≤1⁄2 the optimal dose of beta blocker prescribed and ≤1⁄2 the optimal dose of MRA prescribed
  • Written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria:

  • Age <18 or >85 years
  • Clearly documented intolerance to high doses of beta blockers
  • Clearly documented intolerance to high doses of RAS blockers (both ACEi and ARB)
  • Mechanical ventilation (not including CPAP/BiPAP) in the 24 hours prior to screening
  • Significant pulmonary disease contributing substantially to the patient’s dyspnoea such as FEV1 <1 L or need for chronic systemic or non-systemic steroid therapy, or any kind of primary right heart failure such as primary pulmonary hypertension or recurrent pulmonary embolism
  • Myocardial infarction, unstable angina or cardiac surgery within 3 months, or CRT device implantation within 3 months, or PTCI within 1 month prior to screening
  • Index event (admission for AHF) triggered primarily by a correctable aetiology such as significant arrhythmia (e.g. sustained ventricular tachycardia, or atrial fibrillation/flutter with sustained ventricular response >130 bpm, or bradycardia with sustained ventricular arrhythmia <45 bpm), infection, severe anaemia, acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, exacerbation of COPD, planned admission for device implantation or severe non-adherence leading to very significant fluid accumulation prior to admission and brisk diuresis after admission. Troponin elevations without other evidence of an acute coronary syndrome are not an exclusion
  • Uncorrected thyroid disease, active myocarditis, or known amyloid or hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
  • History of heart transplant or on a transplant list, or using or plan to be implanted with a ventricular assist device
  • Sustained ventricular arrhythmia with syncopal episodes within the 3 months prior to screening that is untreated
  • Presence at screening of any haemodynamically significant valvular stenosis or regurgitation,
    except mitral or tricuspid regurgitation secondary to left ventricular dilatation, or the presence of any haemodynamically significant obstructive lesion of the left ventricular outflow tract
  • Active infection at any time during the AHF hospitalisation prior to randomisation based on abnormal temperature and elevated WBC count need for intravenous antibiotics
  • Stroke or TIA within the 3 months prior to screening
  • Primary liver disease considered to be life threatening
  • Renal disease or eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (as estimated by the simplified MDRD formula) at screening or history of dialysis
  • Psychiatric or neurological disorder, cirrhosis, or active malignancy leading to a life expectancy <6 months
  • Prior (defined as <30 days from screening) or current enrolment in a CHF trial or participation in an investigational drug or device study within the 30 days prior to screening
  • Discharge for the AHF hospitalisation anticipated to be >14 days from admission, or to a long-term care facility. Randomisation must occur within 12 days following admission and within 2 days prior to anticipated discharge
  • Inability to comply with all study requirements due to major comorbidities, social or financial issues, or a history of non-compliance with medical regimens, that might compromise the patient’s ability to understand and/or comply with the protocol instructions or follow-up procedures
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women

Achieving GDMT

NT-proBNP helps leading GDMT optimisation

With NT-proBNP testing you can practice precision medicine and strike a balance between being too aggressive or too cautious with HF management.1,7,8

gdmt chart

Reassure your patients with the proven benefits of rapid, high intensity care

You can now implement the STRONG-HF biomarker-led therapeutic strategy in your own practice and drive the same positive results for your patients with acute heart failure.1

Reduced risk

Reduced risk of all-cause death or heart failure readmission by Day 180

34% RRR

Adjusted risk ratio = 0.66

(95% CI: 0.50–0.86; p=0.0021)

 

8.1% ARR

Adjusted treatment effect = 8.1%

(95% CI: 2.9–13.2; p=0.0021)

Quality of Life

Improved quality of life

3.49

(95% CI: 1.74–5.24; p<0.0001)

Adjusted mean change from baseline to Day 90 in EQ-5D VAS = 3.49

Adverse events

No increased risk of serious adverse events

Network

Consistent results across all subgroups

such as age, gender, baseline LVEF, baseline NT-proBNP and history of atrial fibrillation or flutter

NT-proBNP offers clinicians precision guidance1,5

The STRONG-HF study demonstrated the strength of combining an intensive treatment protocol with the guardrails of frequent monitoring and biomarker testing. Monitoring biomarker levels, in particular NT-proBNP, you can strike a balance between being too aggressive or too cautious with your treatment optimisation.1,5

The decision to up titrate is based on tangible results.1,8

up-titration & pause up-titration comparison

NT-proBNP testing is a key component of the STRONG-HF treatment strategy

and guides the up-titration of GDMT during the vulnerable phase. Use this strategy to aid you in making informed dosing decisions and monitoring prognosis.1,6

Confidence in proven positive patient outcomes1

Guided optimisation of GDMT using biomarkers including NT-proBNP significantly contributed to reducing mortality or hospital readmission at 180 days, without increasing the risk of serious adverse events.1

How could the STRONG-HF pathway transform HF care in your network?

heart pulse

Rapid initiation of treatment within the post-acute vulnerable phase1

With the STRONG-HF biomarkerled therapeutic strategy, patients with acute heart failure can be quickly up-titrated within weeks of discharge to maximally tolerated doses of GDMT.1

doctors icon

Tailored high-intensity care enabled by baseline stratification6

Gradation of patients based on changes in biomarkers including NT-proBNP measurements can guide the optimisation of different GDMT treatments as well as the dose adjustments of diuretics, helping you fine-tune and tailor therapy for individual patients.6

Thus, NT-proBNP testing within the STRONG-HF treatment strategy allows for personalised care based on each individual patient’s clinical characteristics.6

checkboard icon

Safety monitoring guided by NT-proBNP and other biomarkers9

The safety of rapid optimisation was guided by frequent monitoring including NT-proBNP measurement. 41% of patients had an NT-proBNP >10% and this was the most commonly reported safety indicator informing clinical decision making.9

cross briefcase icon

Frequent follow-up now = reduced risk of readmission later1

Rapid up-titration of GDMT supported by frequent follow-up and biomarker monitoring in the first few weeks of discharge can significantly reduce the risk of hospital readmission and therefore potentially reduce pressures on emergency care departments.1

family icon

Optimising treatment for as many eligible patients as possible1

The STRONG-HF study demonstrated that rapid up-titration was tolerated and lead to reduced hospitalisations and mortality across sub-groups including age, LVEF category, ethnicity and baseline biomarkers.1

Embrace precision and always stay
one step ahead with NT-proBNP led
GDMT optimisation1,6

Get in touch to learn more about how Roche and STRONG-HF are supporting HCPs to optimise acute HF care.

Abbreviations

HF – heart failure; ACEi – angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB – angiotensin-2 receptor blockers; BB – beta blockers; GDMT – guideline directed medical therapy; mmHg – millimetres of mercury; bpm – beats per minutes; mEq/L – milliequivalents per litre; mmol/L – millimoles per litre; pg/mL – picograms per millilitre; ARNi - angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor; MRA - mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; RAS - renin-angiotensin system; CPAP – continuous positive airway pressure; BiPAP – bilevel positive airway pressure; FEV1 - forced expiratory volume in 1 second; CRT - cardiac resynchronisation therapy; PTCI - percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention; AHF – acute heart failure; COPD - chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; WBC – white blood cell; TIA - transient ischemic attack; eGFR – estimated glomerular filtration rate; MDRD - modification of diet in renal disease; CHF – congestive heart failure; SGLT2i - sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors; HGB – haemoglobin; RRR - Relative risk reduction; CI – confidence interval; ARR – absolute risk reduction; LVEF - left ventricular ejection fraction; HR – heart rate; SBP – systolic blood pressure; mL/min – millilitres per minute

 

References

  1. Mebazaa A, et al. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial. Lancet. 2022;400:1938-52.
  2. Khan MS, et al. Trends in 30- and 90-day readmission rates for heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2021;14:e008335.
  3. Lawson C et al. Trends in 30-day readmissions following hospitalisation for heart failure by sex, socioeconomic status and ethnicity. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jul 14;38:101008. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101008. PMID: 34308315; PMCID: PMC8283308
  4. Conrad N, et al. 2019. PLOS Medicine 16(5): e1002805
  5. Richards M. Troughton RW. NT-proBNP in heart failure: therapy decisions and monitoring. Eur J Heart Fail. 2004;6:35 1-4
  6. Adamo M, et al. NT-proBNP and high-intensity care for acute heart failure: the STRONG-HF trial. Eur Heart J. 2023;doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad335.
  7. Greene SJ, et al. In-hospital initiation of quadruple medical therapy for heart failure: making the post-discharge vulnerable phase far less vulnerable. Eur J Heart Fail. 2022;24:227-9.
  8. Kimmoun A, et al. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of rapid optimization, helped by NT-proBNP and GDF-15, of Heart Failure therapies (STRONG-HF): rationale and design for a multicentre, randomized, parallel-group study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21:1459-67.
  9. Tomasoni D, et al. Safety indicators in patients receiving high-intensity care after hospital admission for acute heart failure: the STRONG-HF trial. J Card Fail. 2023 Sep 29:S1071-9164(23)00342-1. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.09.002. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37820896.
  10. McDonagh T, et al. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3627-39.