Article

The ROI of lab automation: A guide for lab leaders on maximizing lab efficiency

Published on November 26, 2025 | 10 min read
An illustration showing a laboratory setting with a large robotic arm holding a vial over a microscope

Key takeaways

  • Lab leaders increasingly view automation as a necessity for streamlining processes in today’s pressurized environment
  • Lab automation provides significant cost reduction and a strong return on investment (ROI) by minimizing labor costs, reducing error-related expenses, and decreasing reagent and consumable waste through tighter process control
  • Successful lab automation depends on aligning people, processes, and systems, and  leaders should start with a focused, modular pilot

Today’s laboratories are operating in an environment marked by unrelenting pressure. Faced with rapidly growing test volumes, tightening budgets, rising test complexity, and a shrinking workforce, traditional manual workflows are struggling to match the required scale and speed,1 leading to bottlenecks and inefficiencies.

For a deep dive on how lab automation can improve efficiency and save costs, check out our ebook Automation in the lab: A guide to drive efficiency and maximize cost savings,  which explores the factors driving the current need for automation, the tools available, the quantifiable benefits, and practical steps for successful implementation. 

The pressures driving the automation imperative

Automation is a direct response to a perfect storm of operational challenges. Lab leaders are turning to integrated systems to mitigate five major pressures:

  1. Overwhelming sample volume: The sheer volume of testing has surged across all sectors (from clinical diagnostics to molecular biology).2 Physicians and patients demand faster turnaround times (TAT) and real-time access to results, expectations that manual approaches often fail to meet.3
  2. Staffing and skills gap: Highly-trained personnel are an expensive and scarce resource. When these experts are relegated to performing repetitive tasks like pipetting and data transcription, their valuable skills are underutilized, leading to burnout, low job satisfaction, and high turnover.4
  3. Data explosion and complexity: High-throughput technologies, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), generate massive volumes of data that conventional methods cannot adequately capture, interpret, or integrate.5,6
  4. The reliability imperative: Manual processes inherently introduce variability.7 Even the most careful technician is prone to fatigue or minor inconsistencies, which can lead to costly errors, failed quality control checks, and a lack of data reproducibility.8
  5. The financial squeeze: Laboratories are constantly battling tighter budgets and rising material costs. Manual inefficiencies, such as wasted reagents, overtime hours, and costs associated with reprocessing erroneous samples, cut deeply into profit margins.9

A toolkit for lab efficiency: What to automate

The modern automated lab is not a single piece of equipment, but an integrated digital ecosystem. The following is an in-depth breakdown of the interconnected technologies that form the foundation of this ecosystem:

  • Robotic automation and liquid handlers: These are the physical workhorses, performing high-precision tasks like pipetting, plate handling, and sample sorting at speeds and volumes impossible for human hands.10,11 They are the essential foundation for high-throughput screening (HTS) and routine sample preparation.12,13
  • Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS): As the digital backbone of the lab, LIMS and related middleware centralize data management, track every sample's journey, and automate routine documentation.14,15 These systems are crucial for maintaining an audit-ready state and ensuring regulatory compliance throughout the entire workflow.
  • Advanced data tools (AI/ML): Beyond pure process automation, tools leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) are accelerating data analysis.16 These systems can process complex imaging, genomic data, and vast datasets to identify hidden patterns, accelerate interpretation, and enable faster, more predictive decision-making in research and diagnostics.16-18

Tangible returns: Quantifying the benefits of lab automation

Labs that adopt automation are seeing clear gains across performance, quality, and resource use. There are tangible returns to taking on automation, including: 

  • Significant cost reductions: Automation helps manage increasing sample volumes with fewer new hires and less overtime, directly reducing labor costs.19 It minimizes error-related expenses, leading to fewer reruns, and reduces waste of reagents and consumables through tighter process control.20 Ultimately, this delivers a strong return on investment (ROI) by stabilizing the cost structure.
  • Enhanced operational efficiency: Automated systems streamline tasks from sample to result, supporting continuous, 24/7 operations by removing manual handoffs and bottlenecks.21,22
  • Improved quality and reproducibility: Automation ensures every sample is processed the same way, every time, leading to greater consistency and improving confidence in findings.23 Automated platforms also enhance data integrity and traceability, helping labs maintain compliance and align with ALCOA+ data principles.24,25
  • Better staff morale and safety: When teams are freed from repetitive, low-value tasks, they can focus on higher-value work that utilizes their skills, contributing to better job satisfaction and retention.26,27

A step-by-step path to successful lab automation?

Moving from readiness to action requires a clear plan. Here are some practical steps for implementing automation with confidence:

  • Evaluate readiness: Identify high-frequency, predictable workflows—such as sample preparation or data entry—that are truly worth automating for a focused pilot.28
  • Think ahead: Start small and think modularly, beginning with a pilot deployment to validate effectiveness and integration before a wider rollout.
  • Build your team: Assemble a cross-functional implementation team, ensuring buy-in from all stakeholders (operators, data managers, compliance personnel). Set clear success metrics (like reducing TAT or error rates) from day one.29
Scientist laboratory technician and lab manager growing together green plants in eco friendly laboratory

Download our eBook

Are you ready to stop managing bottlenecks and start leading breakthroughs?

The time for a tactical shift in your laboratory operations is now. Download our definitive guide, “Automation in the lab: A guide to drive efficiency and maximize cost savings,” to unlock true lab efficiency, empower your teams, and secure the financial resilience of your lab.

Get our latest insights

Join our community and stay up to date with the latest laboratory innovations and insights.

Contributor

Roche building

LabLeaders insights

LabLeaders insights provides expert information, opinions, and strategies aimed at helping LabLeaders identify effective solutions to maximize lab quality, sustainability, and efficiency.

Explore articles from our community

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get a summary of our most important articles. 
Get invited to our exclusive healthcare webinars. 
Receive our latest insights and ebooks.

References

  1. Siemens Healthineers. (2018). Article available from https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/fr-be/news/mso-increase-workforce-productivity.html.[Accessed September 2025]
  2. Hartmann Young. (2024). Article available from: https://www.hartmannyoung.com/resources/blog/what-are-the-2025-trends-in-diagnostics-/. [Accessed September 2025]
  3. Envirocare labs. (2024).Article available from: https://proficiencytesting.in/overcoming-the-bottleneck-effect-in-laboratory-operations/.
    [Accessed September 2025]
  4. Today’s Clinical Lab. (2021). Article is available from: https://www.clinicallab.com/the-impact-of-burnout-on-clinical-lab-staff-25911 [Accessed September 2025]
  5. Zhong Y et al. (2021). Ann Lab Med, 41(1), 25-43. Paper available from https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2021.41.1.25 [Accessed September 2025]
  6. Cremin CJ. (2022). CRBIOT, 4, 138-151. Paper available from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590262822000090 [Accessed September 2025]
  7. Cobey KD et al. (2024). PLoS Biol, 22(11), e3002870. Paper available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39499707/ [Accessed September 2025]
  8. Van Moll C. (2023). J Patient Saf, 19(8), 573-579. Paper available from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10662575/ [Accessed September 2025]
  9. Medical Laboratory Observer. (2021). Article available from https://www.mlo-online.com/management/qa-qc/article/21235217/creative-conservation-of-lab-supplies-Reduces-waste [Accessed September 2025]
  10. Nature. (2024). Article available from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03714-6 [Accessed September 2025]
  11. Harazono Y et al. (2024). SLAS Tech, 29(6), 100200. Paper available from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2472630324000827 [Accessed September 2025]
  12. Rupp N et al. (2022). SLAS Tech, 27(5), 312-318. Paper available from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2472630322051640 [Accessed September 2025]
  13. Iadanza E et al. (2023). Health Technol (Berl), 13(2), 285-300. Paper available from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9813453/  [Accessed September 2025]
  14. Labinsights. (2024). Article available from https://labinsights.nl/en/article/history-and-future-lims-laboratory-information-management-systems [Accessed September 2025]
  15. Sun D et al. (2021). JBB, 3(1), 28-34. Paper available from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588933821000042 [Accessed September 2025]
  16. Hanna MG et al. (2025). Modern Pathology, 38(4), 100705. Paper available from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893395225000018 [Accessed September 2025]
  17. Han G et al. (2025). Nature Communications, 16, 3165. Paper available from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58527-6# [Accessed September 2025]
  18. Technology Networks Informatics. (2023). Article available from https://www.technologynetworks.com/informatics/articles/how-advanced-lims-are-reshaping-The-scientific-experience-3783160  [Accessed September 2025]
  19. Al Naam YA et al. (2022). J Healthc Leadersh, 14, 55-62. Paper available from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9109973/  [Accessed September 2025]
  20. Medical Laboratory Observer. (2021). Article available from https://www.mlo-online.com/continuing-education/article/21230466/minimizing-laboratory-errors-with-Automation [Accessed September 2025]
  21. Tanasijevic MJ et al. (2021). Laboratory Medicine, 52(4), 329-337. Paper available from https://academic.oup.com/labmed/article/52/4/329/6092797 [Accessed September 2025]
  22. Today’s Clinical Lab. (2021). Article available from https://www.clinicallab.com/total-Laboratory-automation-what-to-consider-25864 [Accessed September 2025]
  23. Automata. (2025). Article available from https://automata.tech/blog/how-to-ensure-lab-reproducibility-with-automation/ [Accessed September 2025]
  24. NNIT. (2025). Article available from https://slcontrols.com/en/what-is-alcoa-and-why-is-it-important-to-validation-and-data-integrity/ [Accessed September 2025]
  25. ECA Academy. (2021). Article available from https://www.gmp-compliance.org/gmp-news/alcoa-what-does-it-mean [Accessed September 2025]
  26. Astech. (2025). Article available from https://astechprojects.co.uk/resources/lab-personnel-automation [Accessed September 2025]
  27. Nam Y et al. (2025). Ann Lab Med, 45(5), 472-483. Paper available from https://www.annlabmed.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.3343/alm.2024.0581 [Accessed September 2025]
  28. Rupp N et al. (2023). Article available from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10758358/ [Accessed September 2025]
  29. Medical Laboratory Observer. (2017). Article available from https://www.mlo-online.com/information-technology/automation/article/13009081/the-human-side-of-lab-automation [Accessed September 2025]