Key takeaways
- The 2026 renaming of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) to polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS) is key to shaping how the condition is understood, diagnosed and managed; diagnosis under the old framework was often delayed leaving many women waiting years and consulting multiple healthcare professionals before receiving an answer
- The new naming frames PMOS as the systemic metabolic condition rather than a disorder of the ovaries, and it explains why diagnostic approaches centred on ovarian morphology miss the underlying pathology
- Combining the name transition to PMOS and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) testing per latest Rotterdam criteria can help speed up women’s diagnosis with faster and less invasive tests
From PCOS to PMOS: Why the name had to change
In 2026, an international consensus renamed polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) as polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS).1 For decades, the name PCOS directed clinical attention toward the ovaries, while the underlying metabolic dysfunction driving the condition often went unrecognized.
The name was not just inaccurate. It shaped how the condition was understood, diagnosed and managed.
The new name reflects current scientific understanding of the condition.
P, polyendocrine. Multiple hormone systems are disrupted, not one organ.
M, metabolic. Insulin resistance and glucose dysregulation are the core drivers, not incidental findings.2
O, ovarian. The ovaries show the effects; they are not the source.
S, syndrome. A cluster of features across body systems, not a single disease.
Diagnosis under the old framework was often delayed. Inconsistent diagnostic criteria and low clinician confidence compounded these delays, leaving many women waiting years and consulting multiple healthcare professionals before receiving an answer.3-5 A misleading name does more than mislabel a condition. It misdirects diagnosis.
The real driver is metabolic, not the ovaries
Insulin resistance is an intrinsic feature of PMOS, present independently of body weight.2 While obesity amplifies metabolic risk and is strongly associated with the elevated odds of type 2 diabetes observed in PMOS, insulin resistance persists in lean women with the condition.2,6,7 This distinction matters: it reframes PMOS as a systemic metabolic condition rather than a disorder of the ovaries, and it explains why diagnostic approaches centred on ovarian morphology miss the underlying pathology.
From PCOS to PMOS: Why a name change is a diagnostic correction
PMOS and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) testing
PMOS is typically diagnosed using the Rotterdam criteria, which require two of three features: polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM), hyperandrogenism, and oligo/anovulation.8
In practice, diagnosis is challenging, because symptoms are heterogeneous and overlap with other conditions, and assessing PCOM by ultrasound can be inconsistent.5,9 As a result, an estimated 70% of women with PMOS remain undiagnosed.10
To address this, international guidelines note that serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a blood-based marker, can be used to diagnose PCOM in adults.8 As a simple blood test, it offers a more objective and accessible alternative to ultrasound, supporting earlier and more consistent diagnosis.8
Roche Diagnostics is dedicated to transforming women's health by raising awareness, addressing barriers, and collaborating with stakeholders worldwide. Watch the videos below to understand why this matters to you.
*This educational video series was developed prior to the PMOS name change, but the information they contain is still highly relevant.
- Teede HJ, et al. Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome, the new name for polycystic ovary syndrome: a multistep global consensus process. Lancet. 2026;407:2329–39.
- Cassar S, et al. Insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp studies. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2619–31.
- Dokras A, et al. Gaps in knowledge among physicians regarding diagnostic criteria and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:1380–6.
- Verity. Breaking the Cycle: Addressing Systemic Failures in PCOS Diagnosis and Management. [Internet; cited 2026 Sep 4]. Available from: https://www.verity-pcos.org.uk/uploads/6/7/0/2/6702442/verity_appg_pcos_report_sept25.pdf.
- Gibson-Helm M, et al. Delayed diagnosis and a lack of information associated with dissatisfaction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:604–12.
- Anagnostis P, et al. Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in polycystic ovary syndrome is associated with obesity: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Endocrine. 2021;74:245–53.
- Kakoly NS, et al. Ethnicity, obesity and the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes in PCOS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24:455–67.
- Teede HJ, et al. Recommendations from the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2023;120:767–93.
- Barthelmess EK and Naz RK. Polycystic ovary syndrome: current status and future perspective. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2014;6:104–19.
- March WA, et al. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:544–51.