Elecsys® sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for preeclampsia

Objective results. Accurate risk prediction. Delivered with speed.

 

pregnant woman discussing preeclampsia diagnosis with doctor

Enabling confidence in preeclampsia prediction when reliable answers matter most

Contact Roche

Would you like to know more about the preeclampsia ratio? Please fill out the form to be contacted by a Roche representative in your region.

References

  1. Burwick RM, Rodriguez MH. Angiogenic biomarkers in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Apr 1;143(4):515-523..
  2. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 222. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:e237–60.
  3. Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System. Centers for Disease Control. Accessed February 5, 2025.
  4. Pregnancy-Related Deaths: Data from 14 U.S.Maternal Mortality Review Committees, 2008-2017. Centers for Disease Control. 2019.
  5. Elecsys sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for preeclampsia. 2025 v 1.0. English.
  6. Zeisler H, et al. Predictive value of the sFlt-1:PlGF ratio in women with suspected preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2016;374:13–22.
  7. Zhang et al. Prediction of adverse outcomes by common definitions of hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:261–7.
  8. Thadhani, et al. Circulating angiogenic factor levels in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. NEJM Evid 2022;1:EVIDoa2200161.
  9. Levine RJ, et al. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2004;350:672–83.
  10. Rana S, et al. Angiogenic factors and the risk of adverse outcomes in women with suspected preeclampsia. Circulation 2012;125:911–9.
  11. Berg A, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025;234:834–855.
  12. Khosla, et al. Cost effectiveness of the sFlt1/PlGF ratio test as an adjunct to the current practice of evaluating suspected preeclampsia in the United States, Pregn Hyperten 2021; 26:121-126.
  13. Biomarker prediction of preeclampsia with severe features. Clinical practice update to ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 222. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2024;143:6.
  14. Backes CH, et al. Maternal preeclampsia and neonatal outcomes. J Pregnancy. 2011 Apr 4;2011:214365.
  15. Shih, et al. The rising burden of preeclampsia in the United States impacts both maternal and child health. Amer Journal of Perinatology 2016;33:329-338.
  16. Suresh, et al. Evaluation of angiogenic factors in the decision to admit women with suspected preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2020. Epub 2020 May 29.