HGPS is a private hospital with a non-profit board. It is a tertiary-level care hospital with approximately 300 beds. It has electronic health records, which is an advantage for patient management, as the hospital laboratory and radiology information systems are connected.
However, the following issues needed to be addressed:
- Medical staff ordered glucose monitoring in the patient’s electronic health record (on an evaluation form, rather than a laboratory entry form)
- Nurses had to check patient records because there was no alert system
- Materials for each test had to be drawn from the hospital’s pharmacy unit
- Results were manually registered by nurses using paper charting
Results:
Doctors can now order glucose monitoring and desired frequency as a lab test order entry in the patient EMR and nurses have a specific work view where every entry pops up and is organized by ward. The hospital enjoys bidirectional connectivity between POCT data management software and the laboratory information system/hospital information system.
Insights and lessons learned:
- Choose one test (or one device) to implement at a time: There is a wide POCT menu, which includes blood glucose, cardiac markers, blood gases, coagulation and infections – but it’s best to focus on one at a time.
- Tech specifications: Make sure you evaluate every specification of the device/software you are implementing. IT and healthcare teams often have their own language, so take the IT personnel "out of the computer" and into the field with you. Express your needs clearly, using non-technical language, and try out what they are suggesting before approving.
- Cost-effectiveness analysis: POCT can be more expensive than testing in a central laboratory and so a cost-effectiveness analysis must be completed.
- Set objective goals and implement a time/goal chart:
- Identify key users and train them (in this hospital, they designated new positions – a lab POCT coordinator and nurse POCT coordinator)
- Verify that everyone has IT access and what the workflow is
- Try not to train personnel until everything is ready (otherwise, users will be trained on the wrong version)
- Make sure things work, e.g., a verification test of the complete workflow with dummy patients
- Make sure users have the contacts they need in case they encounter issues during implementation
- Constant monitoring in phase 1:
- Make sure visual rapid guidelines for device uses are available
- Ask coordinators to constantly monitor device status and use through the software
- Ask coordinators to do rounds and generate weekly reports
- Use the control options available in the device
- Constant monitoring in phase 2:
- Develop a continuous training program with a minimum year-round frequency (so new personnel receive a minimum training program). You may wish to add this to your new personnel induction programs.
- Ask key users to actively identify improvements.
Dra. Lic. Anel Guzmán concluded her presentation with these final considerations:
- POCT requires significant support from the laboratory to ensure the quality testing requirements
- Buy-in and support from top management is key
- Programs are most successful with multidisciplinary involvement and extensive, coordinated clinician education
- Take it to its maximum potential but follow your personnel/institution’s rhythm
- Take the experience and apply it to other POCT implementations