Article

Advancing CVD Management with Digital Triage Tools in the emergency room

Published on 20 Feb, 2025 | 10 min read
thumbnail-cardialogue-emergency-rooms-triage-chest-pain

Key takeaways

  • Clinical decision support tools (CDSTs) can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and streamline workflows in the emergency department. By integrating these tools healthcare professionals are assisted in making timely and precise decisions, leading to better patient outcomes, reduced diagnostic errors and more efficient use of healthcare resources1,2
  • CDSTs can support the shift towards personalized medicine by tailoring recommendations to individual patient characteristics. Using high-quality robust data, machine learning algorithms and real-time data analytics, digital triage tools enable the early identification of either high- or low-risk patients and the delivery of personalized treatment plans. This also reduces healthcare costs by preventing potential complications and unnecessary clinical interventions
  • Future advancements, including the integration with wearable devices, genomic data, and telemedicine, hold promise for further enhancing the capabilities and impact of CDSTs in cardiovascular disease (CVD) patient management

Cardiovascular disease and digital triage tools for rapid chest pain evaluation in emergency rooms

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) encompasses a range of conditions, including coronary artery disease, heart failure, arrhythmias, and stroke. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), CVD accounts for approximately 17.9 million deaths annually, representing 31% of all global deaths.3 The broad presentation of CVD often requires immediate and precise intervention to improve patient outcomes. About 20% of emergency room visits are preventable, with half being for cardiovascular conditions.4 The complexity of diagnosing and managing CVD, particularly in the emergency room, necessitates advanced digital triage tools to support clinical decision making and reduce emergency room visits.

What are clinical decision support tools and how do they work?

Clinical decision support tools (CDSTs) are computer-based systems designed to assist healthcare professionals during emergency room triage and follow-up. They integrate patient data, clinical guidelines, and predictive algorithms to provide tailored and specific treatment recommendations. These tools can enhance diagnostic accuracy, streamline workflows, support timely interventions, and improve adherence to guidelines, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.1,2 However, challenges to their implementation include poor familiarisation of physicians with technology, integration difficulties with electronic health records, and bandwidth issues within the digital health infrastructure.

What are the benefits of using digital triage tools?

One of the primary applications of CDSTs in CVD management is during chest pain triage to enhance diagnostic accuracy. For example, CDSTs can analyse high-sensitivity troponin (hs-troponin) levels along with other clinical parameters to stratify a patient’s risk of CVD and guide further testing or treatment.5,6

The implementation of electronic health records integrated with CDSTs can also improve the efficiency of patient care by reducing the time spent on documentation.7

The current triage of chest pain patients is done using an algorithm that is part of the ESC [European Society of Cardiology] recommendations, so patients have to have a pretest probability for the disease or for acute coronary syndrome

Prof. Giannitsis

Expert opinions on CDSTs

Professor Christopher Baugh and Professor Evangelos Giannitsis highlight the significant role of digital triage tools in the emergency room. They discuss that crowding, staffing shortages, and high patient throughput are the biggest challenges in the emergency room. CDSTs can aid in the accurate classification and triage of patients, potentially addressing these challenges

Real-world examples and benefits

Several digital technologies have been developed for CVD management within the emergency room. Notable examples include the HEART score and the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, both of which aid in risk stratification and have been shown to improve the efficiency of care.8-11

The HEART score is a widely used interactive tool for risk stratification in patients with chest pain. It incorporates five elements: patient history, ECG, age, risk factors and troponin levels and categorises patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups, guiding further diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.8 Studies show that its use can reduce unnecessary admissions and improve the efficiency of care in the emergency room.9

The GRACE score is used to predict the risk of death and AMI in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by integrating clinical variables such as age, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and creatinine levels.10 The use of the GRACE score in the emergency room has been associated with an improved risk prediction of mortality in patients with ACS and can help identify high risk patients who may benefit from more aggressive treatment and close monitoring.10,11

Electronic solutions can overcome some limitations, for example, improve guideline adherence and improve quality of care for patients. They even can reduce the length of hospital stay and therefore increase patient satisfaction and reduce costs for staff, patient treatment and monitoring.

Prof. Baugh

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have also led to machine learning algorithms that provide high accuracy in predicting patient outcomes and guiding treatment plans. Machine learning algorithms can also be used to predict the risk of adverse events, such as heart failure exacerbations, allowing for early intervention and improved patient outcomes.12 Integrating AI in emergency medicine allows machine learning algorithms to rapidly analyze complex clinical data, such as serial ECGs, to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes and assist clinicians at the bedside.13

Clinical decision support tools offer numerous benefits, including improved diagnostic accuracy, enhanced patient outcomes, and reduced healthcare costs. By integrating multiple data sources and applying evidence-based algorithms quickly, CDSTs reduce the likelihood of diagnostic errors and ensure that patients receive appropriate care promptly.1 Studies demonstrate that CDSTs in managing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can reduce mortality and morbidity rates and support personalized care by tailoring recommendations to individual patient characteristics.12,14

Challenges and limitations

While CDSTs provide broad benefits, challenges remain, including data quality and completeness, user acceptance, and ethical and legal considerations. Accurate data input and seamless integration with existing electronic health record systems are crucial for successful implementation. Overcoming resistance to change and ensuring healthcare professionals are adequately trained are essential for the adoption of CDSTs. Professor Giannitsis suggests there is poor familiarisation with digital devices in a very heterogeneous healthcare landscape. Additionally, addressing bandwidth issues within the digital health infrastructure is necessary for the widespread use of these tools.

Future prospects

"There is a lot of excitement over what new technology in the emergency room could bring to complement the clinician, to make him or her more efficient and safer in their practice and to take them away from the computer and to the bedside where they want to be spending their time,” said Prof. Baugh. Advancements in technology and data science offer new opportunities for their use in emergency rooms and broader clinical practice. The integration of CDSTs with wearable devices and remote monitoring systems can provide continuous data on patients' cardiovascular health, enabling early detection and proactive management.15 Furthermore, the use of CDSTs in clinical research can enhance patient recruitment, retention, and the development of new clinical guidelines.

Conclusion

CDSTs have the potential to revolutionise CVD management in the emergency room by improving diagnostic accuracy, streamlining workflows, and supporting timely interventions. Addressing challenges related to data quality, user acceptance, and ethical considerations is essential for their successful implementation. Ongoing advancements in technology hold promise for further enhancing personalized medicine and clinical research. By embracing CDSTs and integrating them into routine emergency room practices, healthcare professionals can significantly improve patient outcomes and quality of life for those with CVD.

We have to improve healthcare delivery for the sake of the patient and every effort that we make is beneficial for them. I believe that implementation of clinical decision tools using algorithms that are based on knowledge and on guidelines will be very helpful in the future.

Prof. Giannitsis
Email Icon

Join the CarDiaLogue

Join the CarDiaLogue today and sign up for updates.

Contributors

Headshot Prof Evangelos Giannitsis MD PhD

Evangelos Giannitsis, MD, PhD

Cardiologist at University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
Prof Giannitsis is a senior physician in Cardiology at the University of Heidelberg, where he also leads the Cardiac Biomarker Research Group. His research focuses on cardiac biomarkers, particularly troponins, and their integration with cardiac MRI phenotypes. He currently chairs the certification committee for Chest Pain Units for the German Society of Cardiology. Prof Giannitsis is an Assistant Editor of Clinical Research in Cardiology, an active member of the ESC, and has co-authored over 600 publications.
headshot of Chris Baugh

Chris Baugh, MD, MBA, FACEP

Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine at Harvard Medical School, USA
Prof Baugh is an Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine at Harvard Medical School, USA, and recently completed a 5-year term as the Vice Chair of Clinical Affairs for the Department of Emergency Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. He attended the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and obtained his MBA from the Wharton School. He trained in Emergency Medicine at Brigham and Women’s and Massachusetts General Hospitals. He previously served as the Medical Director of both the Brigham’s Urgent Care Center and Department of Emergency Medicine and as Chair of the Observation Medicine Section of the American College of Emergency Physicians. He recently joined the Board of Trustees of the Emergency Medicine Foundation. His clinical interests are in emergency medicine, cardiology, oncology, healthcare finance, healthcare policy, observation medicine, clinical operations, and quality and safety. He has co-authored over 160 publications in his field and has published on the clinical and administrative aspects of observation care in the New England Journal of Medicine, Health Affairs, JAMA Open, Annals of Emergency Medicine, and Academic Emergency Medicine.

Explore articles from our community

Illustration of a heard and cardiologists

Join the CarDiaLogue community

CarDiaLogue brings you the latest valuable perspectives from some of the sharpest minds in cardiology to complement your specialist skills.

We provide access to insights from world-renowned experts and thought leaders, sharing the latest clinical evidence, presenting the newest guidelines, offering educational events, and providing actionable insights for the management of cardiometabolic diseases.

Get a free copy of our latest infographic when you sign up for the CarDiaLogue community and be the first to receive updates with the latest cardiology insights.

References

  1. Kwan JL, et al. Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2020;370:m3216.

  2. Van de Velde S, et al. A systematic review of trials evaluating success factors of interventions with computerised clinical decision support. Implement Sci. 2018;13:114.

  3. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [Internet; cited 2026 Sep 25]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds.

  4. Slagman A. Prevalence of cardiovascular ambulatory care sensitive conditions in the emergency department. Poster presented at European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress; October 2016.

  5. Than MP, et al. Machine Learning to Predict the Likelihood of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2019;140:899–909.

  6. Boeddinghaus J, et al. Machine Learning for Myocardial Infarction Compared With Guideline-Recommended Diagnostic Pathways. Circulation. 2024;149:1090–101.

  7. Kawamoto K, et al. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005;330:765.

  8. Backus BE, et al. A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:2153–8.

  9. Mahler SA, et al. The HEART Pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015;8:195–203.

  10. Fox KA, et al. Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE). BMJ. 2006;333:1091.

  11. Georgiopoulos G, et al. Modification of the GRACE Risk Score for Risk Prediction in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. JAMA Cardiol. 2023;8:946–56.

  12. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25:44–56.

  13. Choi JH, et al. Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Atrial Fibrillation Using Serial 12-Lead ECGs Based on Left Atrial Remodeling. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13:e034154.

  14. Garg AX, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293:1223–38.

  15. Steinhubl SR, et al. The emerging field of mobile health. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:283rv3.